Regarding your comments to Mary about R.C. Sproul thinking your a heretic. I am just learning about NTC so I cannot comment but the fact that you believe in the Gifts to most Reformed you should be stoned

We would have to assume one of two or maybe three things about Mr. Sproul to come to the conclusion that he is not intentionally lying when he says NCT is antinomian.

1) He does not know the definition of the word antinomian.

-or-

2) He does not know what NCT teaches.

-or-

3) Both.

Which begs the question, should someone write about an issue of which they are completely ignorant?

There may have been a time when he did not have all the information and we could come to the conclusion that the esteemed doctor just got his scholarship all wrong, but he has received many gracious letters from NCT proponents correcting his misrepresentations of NCT.

So if there was a time that he was ignorant of the facts, that time has long come and gone.

Many times people who enjoy positions and titles such as Mr. Sproul are very resistant to admitting they are wrong.

He has had ample opportunity to correct his errors and say, “I still disagree with NCT, but it clearly does not teach lawlessness.”

That is what every honest and respectable person would do when proven to have made erroneous and slanderous statements.

If it makes you bristle less, I could say that Mr. Sproul is not being honest with the facts.

When I read you saying that Dr. Sproul is lying about New Covenant Theology, it makes me bristle. Calling him a liar is saying that he knows NCT does not teach antinomianism, but says it does anyway.

Is that actually the case?

Mary